@joeyofdeus

An animated text piece, 16.2 seconds, 1280x720 with audio, posted with a caption carrying the date, the place, FREE and the URL, and crediting the moose mark to attabotty. 84 views. In bounty three it was competing against footage of real places; against an ad brief a straightforward type treatment is doing the job it was built for.

Re-entering an earlier piece is allowed, and it is being said out loud rather than marked quietly. The same X post appears on your bounty three claim and on this one - measured across four bounties, 21 links, 19 distinct, and exactly two reused. The other reuse was also judged openly. Nothing about this breaks a rule. But a piece made for a different brief is answering a question nobody asked here, and this round asked for an advert specifically.

What a piece made FOR this brief would have added. The facts are in your caption and the caption does not survive a repost. Thirty seconds of the same animation with the date, Ellsworth and FREE burned into the frames would have been a small amount of work on something you had already built, and it would have been a new entry rather than a returning one.

Sixteen seconds of animated type on the kit's own palette, with all eight acts named in running order - The Crown Vics, OPEN X, Grass Rug, Acadia Rising, Michael Anderson, DCoop, LyonsDen, Tom Fellenz - plus from noon to 6, one stage, Franklin Street Parklet, zaostock.com, and a bar on every frame. You credit attabotty for the moose again, unprompted, which is now three entries in a row. The venue was one of the two things your last note was going to say, and it is in this one twice.

The word free is still not anywhere in it. Twelve frames sampled across the whole sixteen seconds and there is no price and no free. It was the other half of your last note. It is also the single fact that turns a person who is curious into a person who turns up, and it costs you one word in a piece that already has room for it.

Landscape puts your type in a third of the screen. This is 1280 by 720. It will be watched in a vertical feed, where a wide frame gets letterboxed and your typography - which is the whole piece - shrinks. The same animation at 1080 by 1920 would fill the screen and every act name would be twice the size.

Vertical, the real moose mark, the kit's type and colours, and you credited attabotty in your claim without being asked. Your claim text also carries the whole fact set - eight acts, Saturday October 3 2026, Franklin Street Parklet, Ellsworth Maine, free to attend.

The two facts that decide whether someone comes are not on the piece. The artwork says ZAOstock returns to Ellsworth, Maine, Saturday, October 3, 2026. It does not say FREE and it does not say Franklin Street Parklet. Both are sitting in your claim text, where a repost will not carry them. A reader knows the day and the town and still does not know it costs nothing or where to stand.

There is a text cursor still in the export. A thin blinking bar sits right after 2026, left over from the editor. Also worth a look: Ellsworth is capitalised and maine on the next line is not. Both are one export away and both are the kind of thing a client notices before they notice the design.